D'uh! I should've worked that out, but ... I didn't.
I've encountered it before. I may even have asked a SoPW on it a ways back. I'm pretty sure I've answered one or two about it, but I could *not* see the ambiguity. I guess that just shows how infrequently the guessing gets it wrong.
Thanks.
In reply to Re^2: Mysterious "syntax error"
by BrowserUk
in thread Mysterious "syntax error"
by BrowserUk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |