D'uh! I should've worked that out, but ... I didn't.
I've encountered it before. I may even have asked a SoPW on it a ways back. I'm pretty sure I've answered one or two about it, but I could *not* see the ambiguity. I guess that just shows how infrequently the guessing gets it wrong.
Thanks.
In reply to Re^2: Mysterious "syntax error"
by BrowserUk
in thread Mysterious "syntax error"
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |