A "true" object orientated language tends to be defined as one in which everything is an object from integers to operators and upwards.
Lanuages such as Ruby purport to be as such although I don't believe even that is 100% OO from what I've read (although I wouldn't quote me on that :))
All code is untested unless otherwise stated.
All opinions expressed are my own and are intended as guidance, not gospel; please treat what I say as such and as Abigail said Think for yourself.
If in doubt ask.
In reply to Re: Is Perl Truly an Object Oriented Language?
by gothic_mallard
in thread Is Perl Truly an Object Oriented Language?
by awohld
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |