I like to use "for" for that kind of thing
Me too, but I have found do{} is more readable. For one thing, it saves you from your bug: Your version throws away the uppercase string and so prints just "goodbye todo el mondo". My version would look like this:
my $sBegin = "hello world"; my $sEnd; for ($sEnd = $sBegin) { s/hello/goodbye/g; s/world/todo el mondo/; $_ = uc; }; print $sEnd;
TIMTOWTDI, but I think do{} is the more readable here.
Update: I trust you. No problem. But the bug still illustrates how the void context makes the for loop slightly less readable here. Such a bug (update: or the more likely opposite bug) could not as easily occur in the do{} block.
print "Just another Perl ${\(trickster and hacker)},"
The Sidhekin proves Sidhe did it!
In reply to Re^3: Confessions of a back-alley map abuser
by Sidhekin
in thread Confessions of a back-alley map abuser
by dimar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |