Something must have gotten lost along the way, because the fact that $self->SUPER::can("bar") is (usually) the same as $self->can("bar") is exactly what I was saying in the very first post… :-) (It can only be different if there is a can in one of the superclasses though, regardless of whether there is one in the current class.)
Basically, I pointed out one of my two mistakes, then explained why it was a mistake, and came up with a broken solution because I missed something I thought I hadn't (that you can ask UNIVERSALL::can about 'SUPER::method'). Then you came along and pointed out my other mistake as well, but said that it somehow invalidated my correct explanation for the mistake I had already spotted.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^11: goto superclass method
by Aristotle
in thread goto superclass method
by avarus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |