Eh, I wasn't discussing new features. Dragonchild asked for examples of things that broke existing programs. I gave them. Add Unicode (should) not break program that don't use Unicode. New stuff should not break existing programs. And p5p is trying to not break programs. But program do get broken. As the examples showed. Stating I'm using the wrong Perls doesn't make any sense in this context.

If you need to use certain features and rely on certain features that are not commonly used, don't move your program to a new major Perl version before thouroughly testing it.

Yes, of course. BUT TESTING AND MODIFYING THE PROGRAMS TAKE RESOURCES. Resources cost money. This thread is about standardization and how it effects Perl. One of the effects of not having standardization is that incompatable changes happen more frequently, and worse, there's no "safe" area to program in - anything can change. This is a hurdle for corporations (and programmers). This will cause people and coorperations to not use Perl. That's how it effects Perl.

Of course, if you don't supply the version of Perl your script is used with, you will need to test your script against all versions of Perl, but at least the future versions of Perl go through prereleases ("Release Candidates") before becoming public, and so you have some chance of getting an early warning by testing your program against bleadperl. Once again, testing only (hopefully) shows the program will break. It only shows resources have to be consumed to get the program working again. It won't fix them. Shipping the version of Perl required is all handy, but if your 5.005_03 program needs to start understanding Unicode, the program shall need to run under 5.6.0 or later. So added to the costs of adding new features to your program come the cost of finding and fixing any breakages.

I never said it wasn't solvable. It is. But the thread is about the effects of non having a standard. And this is one of the effects. I am fully aware there are benefits of not having a standard. I'm not promoting Perl standardization. I'm not even saying it's unacceptable an upgrade of Perl breaks programs. All I am saying is "an upgrade of Perl causes program breakage - and here are some examples". Your reaction of "you're using the wrong Perls then" make as much sense as if you had said "cows can fly".

In reply to Re^10: Ansi Perl by Anonymous Monk
in thread Ansi Perl by Eyck

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.