Actually, it's not. DBD::Mock doesn't actually do anything. In fact, it doesn't even look at the SQL you gave it other than to verify you gave it something. What it does is say "The first statement executed will get resultset A and the second will get resultset B". That's it.
Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.
In reply to Re^2: Automated testing of database classes
by dragonchild
in thread Automated testing of database classes
by MrCromeDome
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |