That is true, and I'm not disagreeing. But at a certain level, I'm still testing DBI, its use of DBD drivers and the DBD::Mock code. That was what I meant.
If I'm going to depend on DBI+DBD+Mock to be in working order, I might as well go for the gusto and use a DBD driver that does something with the statements against a raw DB file I control during testing. That's just my opinion.
In reply to Re^3: Automated testing of database classes
by jk2addict
in thread Automated testing of database classes
by MrCromeDome
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |