I guess this begs a larger question. Are the APIs of DBI and Win32::ODBC similar enough to do a simple replace on any Win32::ODBC calls to make them DBI calls? If you can't, then why would Win32::ODBC still be useful? I understand the history (and if you know you will never move the Perl to a non-Win32 machine, Win32::ODBC will be a better choice than DBD::ODBC), but it seems that DBI would always be the better choice in most solutions.
This is only my opinion, and I want someone to tell me if I'm wrong for thinking this way.
ALL HAIL BRAK!!!
In reply to RE: ODBC and UNIX
by PsychoSpunk
in thread ODBC and UNIX
by otijim
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |