I should think a good middle-point is having each individual script having it's own interpreter -- what's wrong with that? (You could have them last forever, and rely on the kernel to swap them out as it wishes, or you could tear them down if they aren't used for a fixed period.)
In reply to Re^2: Web aps with Perl (6) vs. Longhorn and the Windows API?
by theorbtwo
in thread Web aps with Perl (6) vs. Longhorn and the Windows API?
by spq
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |