FWIW..
This looks to me like a first revision which was intended to be developed further. As mentioned by hardburn the for ($@) sets $_ to the value of $@. Why would we want to do that? So we could then do something like:
eval { # bla bla }; for ($@) { /NOT FOUND/ && do { print 'Where'd I put that?'; last; }; print 'Na,ah. Not for you!' if /FORBIDDEN/; }
Each of those is testing the string value of $@
cheers,
J
In reply to Re: for ($@)
by edoc
in thread for ($@)
by szabgab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |