I realize this is an old post, but I just came from 423779...
A closure is subroutine that has captured its lexical environment which has now gone out of scope.
For completeness, I would add that not all closures are subroutines; regular expressions that use the (?{}) construct can also be closures. For example,
sub a { my $i = 0; # note that the regex is compiled only once () = shift =~ /a(?{print $i++})/g; } a("ababa"); # prints 0 1 2 a("ajaja"); # prints 3 4 5

I don't know if these regular expressions are implemented internally as subroutines, but they certainly don't look like subroutines, so people are often surprised to see this behavior.


In reply to Re: •closures are NOT anonymous subroutines necessarily by itub
in thread subs as args by Anonymous Monk

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.