A couple of years ago, I wrote a review of Algorithm::Diff, as it stood at that time. Since then, tye has taken over maintenance of the module, and made significant changes to its interface (see Algorithm::Diff icult to use for some discussion).
Yesterday I had a chance to use the module with its new interface for the first time. I'd like to update my review with information about the changes, but I don't really like the idea of tacking on an update at the bottom (the interface changes are significant, and deserve to be mentioned higher up in the writeup). Should I just replace most of the node, and add an explanation? I suppose I could post a reply, but that doesn't seem like a good solution either.
Any suggestions on clobber versus add-on?
In reply to Update or replace module review? by VSarkiss
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |