UPDATE

There was a huge error in this test (and I'm stupid for not using strict in it). I was testing @c where I should have been testing @a. I am now going to replace the bad results with the GOOD results.
Here's a benchmark. Six methods were tested, and run for 5 seconds, three times; once on a set of 100 elements, once on 1000, and once on 10000.
in_fr_pu
slices the array in chunks of 4, push()es the hash ref to the new array
140.9 Hz @ 100, 13.9 Hz @ 1000, 1.3 Hz @ 10000

sh_fr_pu
shift()s the array, push()es the hash ref to the new array
156.7 Hz @ 100, 15.7 Hz @ 1000, 1.4 Hz @ 10000

sp_bk_in
presizes the new array, splice()s from the back, inserts the hash ref via index into the new array
149.4 Hz @ 100, 14.8 Hz @ 1000, 1.4 Hz @ 10000

sp_bk_rv
splice()s from the back, push()es the hash ref to the new array, the reverse()s
151.5 Hz @ 100, 14.7 Hz @ 1000, 1.3 Hz @ 10000

sp_bk_un
splice()s from the back, unshift()s the hash ref to the new array
151.6 Hz @ 100, 11.9 Hz @ 1000, .4 Hz @ 10000

sp_fr_pu
splice()s from the front, push()es the hash ref to the new array
160.0 Hz @ 100, 15.6 Hz @ 1000, 1.4 Hz @ 10000
Notice how all of them appear rather linear in form, EXCEPT for sp_bk_un. This is because unshift() is rather inefficient. sp_fr_pu is the fastest because splice()ing from the front just moves the beginning-of-array marker forward in the array. Thus, the next fastest is sh_fr_pu, which just uses 4 calls to shift() instead of splice(). 
use Benchmark;

for $SIZE (100, 1000, 10000) {

timethese(-5, {
  sp_fr_pu => sub {
    my @a = (1..$SIZE);
    my @b;
    while (my @c = splice(@a, 0, 4)) { push @b, { @c } }
  },
  sp_bk_un => sub {
    my @a = (1..$SIZE);
    my @b;
    while (@a and my @c = splice(@a, -4)) { unshift @b, { @c } }
  },
  sp_bk_in => sub {
    my @a = (1..$SIZE);
    my @b;
    $#b = int(@a / 4);
    my $i = $#b;
    while (@a and my @c = splice(@a, -4)) { $b[$i--] = { @c } }
  },
  in_fr_pu => sub {
    my @a = (1..$SIZE);
    my @b;
    my $i = 0;
    while ($i < @a) { push @b, { @a[$i .. $i + 3] }; $i += 4; }
  },
  sh_fr_pu => sub {
    my @a = (1..$SIZE);
    my @b;
    while (@a) { push @b, { map shift(@a), 1..4 } }
  },
  sp_bk_rv => sub {
    my @a = (1..$SIZE);
    my @b;
    while (@a and my @c = splice(@a, -4)) { push @b, { @c } }
    @b = reverse @b;
  },
});

}

[download]


japhy -- Perl and Regex Hacker

In reply to Re: Sort this data by japhy
in thread Sort this data by Anonymous Monk

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.