I totally agree, and said as much in What the [sub]in 'L value do they have?. I even suggested a few ways that the value could be made available to the sub without breaking existing code:
This is analogous to $^N as used in the (??{ code }) regex construct and is mnemonic* with $_.
Corrected per dragonchild's post below.
It could also be extended to @^_ for lvalue list assignment--which has interesting possibilities.
I think it probably would just require someone with the tuits to make such modifications to the sourcecode to produce the patch.
In reply to Re: Experimenting with Lvalue Subs
by BrowserUk
in thread Experimenting with Lvalue Subs
by Limbic~Region
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |