Why not play tricks with =for? It should not be difficult to modify the pod2text converter (or whatever other convert you want) to accept =for private blocks. Then you can have two converters, one for basic API information, and another for private docs. Javadocs have a similar concept, and I think it's a good idea. Getting your developers to follow it is simply a matter of corporate coding policy.
In fact, I think I should probably implement that, or track down a converter that does it already.
"There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.
In reply to Re^4: improving the aesthetics of perl code
by hardburn
in thread improving the aesthetics of perl code
by tcf03
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |