I (at this stage) cannot see a use for localising it.
Let's just say that this is why Larry is designing the language and not you or I… :-)
I don't understand how that would prevent the correct value being localised if it was valid?
I suppose it could work if the lvalue sub was given the rvalue solely for the purpose of validation, but was expected not to do the actual assignment itself. I'm not sure if that has ramifications past the obvious though — that's something Larry will have to answer.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^8: Experimenting with Lvalue Subs
by Aristotle
in thread Experimenting with Lvalue Subs
by Limbic~Region
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |