The problem with that is that it's possible for the docs to be clear, seem complete, and describe friendly syntax... and be wrong. The docs for Math::Matrix, for example, fail to describe a very useful feature -- that the objects have a number of overloaded operators. Somebody just reading the docs and not the code wouldn't be able to tell. (Reminds me; I never got around to writing a bug-report on that.)
It's possible for modules to even have example code in their docs that doesn't run -- something undetectable without actually installing the module. This is what Pod::Tests and other similar modules are for, but not everybody (myself included) uses them.
In reply to Re: Perldocs and peer reviews
by theorbtwo
in thread Perldocs and peer reviews
by g0n
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |