After reading
Fair Use When Referring to Book Answers? I dashed off an email to our friends at O'Reilly.
I would like to know what the O'Reilly position is on the re-use of co
+de in
your books.
Specifically, I belong to an online community centered around the disc
+ussion
of Perl code: www.perlmonks.com, and wonder if it's acceptable use to
+ quote code from
your Perl books as an answer to posted questions (assuming proper attr
+ibution).
I know that most members of perlmonks already own a majority of the Pe
+rl
books you publish (I have 5), so I doubt it would negatively impact sa
+les.
Is this fair use?
I received this response:
For you, comrade, it's fair use. Perl monks should feel free to use th
+is
code to answer posted questions.
Frank Willison
Editor-in-Chief
O'Reilly & Associates
Thought you all might be interested.
Man....how cool is O'Reilly?
~monk d4vis
#!/usr/bin/fnord
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.