We've seen this before when talking about lvalue subs! ;-)
Yes. We have haven't we. It has been a recurrent theme of ours.:)
Though they fixed the original problem of any one sourcecode statement only having a single lvalue ref that got reused each time that statement was reexecuted.
I thought that had fixed the problems--but maybe my notion of what an lvalue ref should do is different from what the authors envisaged?
In reply to Re^2: Scalar refs, aliasing, and recursion weirdness.
by BrowserUk
in thread Scalar refs, aliasing, and recursion weirdness.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |