Sorry, I don't agree: if you're dealing with user input in a situation where they could (intentionally or unintentionally*) damage the system and the language offers you a helping hand, why not use it?Yes, but that's a far cry from "having it on all the time". Most users cannot (on a proper system) damage the system anyway. It doesn't make sense to have taint checking on oh, say "ls", or "vi" (unless you were to make a restricted shell inside "vi").
And it's not that the language offers you a helping hand free of costs. It's like equiping electronic locks on all the doors in your house - including the doors to any closets, and the lid on your toilet. Locks that can only be unlocked (for one time usage, closing the door auto-locks) by typing in 16 character hex code. Sure, it helps reduce theft from your home. But it isn't very convenient to go from one room to another anymore.
In reply to Re^3: Taint mode... use all the time?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Taint mode... use all the time?
by jfroebe
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |