Not to be rude, but no matter how large your program is getting, you have a design problem if you are having to use 30-50 character-length descriptive names for variables and subroutines. I'd go back and fix things up a bit. I have never come across a valid reason for needing to go past 20 characters per item. By using these ridiculously long identifiers, you are creating a maintenance nightmare; nobody else will even want to look at your code, never mind having to actually update the code.
# 49 characters? my deity, what could possibly be wrong # with this horrid picture? my $path_to_configuartion_file_for_apache_http_server = '/etc/httpd/co +nf/httpd.conf'; # 37 characters. just as bad as the 49 charaters above. sub get_the_path_for_apache_configuration { return "who cares?"; }
In reply to Re^2: Does the size of a variable's name affect memory?
by saskaqueer
in thread Does the size of a variable's name affect memory?
by nmerriweather
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |