They have a wonderful saying in Texas that goes something like this: "Be sure your words are soft and sweet, just in case you are forced to eat them" ;)
I find that what works better than 'picking a fight' is a somewhat surprised disbelief that the situation is as the code reviewer describes. Think about it -- what advantage is there to using DBI if it sometimes messes with the ordering of the data? That doesn't sound like a feature to me, it sounds more like a bug.
Alex / talexb / Toronto
"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds
In reply to Re^3: DBI with ORDER BY
by talexb
in thread DBI with ORDER BY
by YoungPups
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |