Wouldnt it be better if your patch was against blead and not maint and that you submit it to p5p for review?
Perhaps. However, I'd like to have a more complete implementation (i.e. one with SmartMatch.pm itself) before sending things over to p5p. I want to avoid discussion of practical problems that simply aren't there, and the only way to do that is to prove it can work before suggesting its inclusion. The advance work usually consumes less time than the discussion avoided by it. Also, I don't care much for the final implementation, and see what we're doing now as a proof of concept (that can very well be implemented without much change, if people like it).
I haven't needed switch/case or given/when myself. But many, many people would prefer it over if/elsif/else structures.
Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
In reply to Re^2: Smart match in p5
by Juerd
in thread Smart match in p5
by xmath
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |