Should it be database independent?
That depends on what it is, doesn't it? For most of the things I create I don't find database portability to be worth very much. I'm roughly as likely to abandon MySQL as I am to abandon Perl!
Maybe if the SQL standard was more usable it would be worth writing to, but frankly, it's not. There's a reason that there isn't a single database product which supports ANSI SQL and nothing else; it's not enough.
-sam
In reply to Re: Should it be database independent?
by samtregar
in thread Should it be database independent?
by szabgab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |