Personally I think syntactic sugar matters a lot, so I wouldn't mind if they extended their SQL dialect to support this since it's obviously something a lot of people have a need for.
(The issue about rowid and "order by" etc is a known issue but it's not a problem with the solution presented at Ask Tom.)
/J
In reply to Re^5: Should it be database independent?
by jplindstrom
in thread Should it be database independent?
by szabgab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |