I'd probably make that
so that the intention is clearer. Or does that mess up the callstack that &-style calling uses?sub functional_FY { return @_ ? ( splice( @_, rand @_, 1 ), &functional_FY ) : (); }
In reply to Re^3: Functional shuffle
by kelan
in thread Functional shuffle
by Roy Johnson
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |