Yes, of course. What was I thinking? This is almost twice as fast as the "cut" approach I proposed, and clearer to boot. Ode to bart
the lowliest monk
In reply to Re^4: Functional shuffle
by tlm
in thread Functional shuffle
by Roy Johnson
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |