I did better than that. Now, the last nodes will get the votes instead of the first. This somewhat balances out the bias toward "first post!" replies getting more votes (for being around longer and starting out being displayed such that they likely get read before other replies).
I don't consider this bias for "first post!" replies to be a big enough "problem" to force random ordering upon people, though. I don't even see much point in providing a "random" option for reply display ordering, though others should feel free to write such, if they see enough point to it.
- tye
In reply to Re^4: Random Order Replies (reversed)
by tye
in thread Random Order Replies
by artist
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |