Just because someone says something doesn't make it true. This isn't just semantics, either.
Perhaps you give us the reference where you found Nat talking about this sort of prototype (article name or page number would work). IF you are talking about the "Cryptocontext" article, I think you've misunderstood something.
In reply to Re^4: The purpose of prototypes in perl subroutines
by brian_d_foy
in thread The purpose of prototypes in perl subroutines
by Plotinus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |