I must be missing something. What's wrong with doing
? It doesn't suffer for the limitations you decribe. The only limitation as far as I can see is that it creates another scope if you use my() et al in the arguments, which is a bad idea anyway and is easily worked around.$chain = sub { $_[0]->method1(@args1)->method2(@args2)->method3(@args3 +) };
Anyway... About your post:
If $method is a string with double colons, or a code reference, or a glob, then $object->$method is equivalent to &$method($object).
It's not true if it's a string with double colons or a glob. It searches the inheritance tree starting at the package specified in the string. The glob stringifies and for some reason '*Bar::foo' is also accepted.
Btw, I think you're playing with fire when you do#!/usr/bin/perl -wl use strict; no strict 'refs'; { package Foo; sub foo { 1 } } { package Bar; use base 'Foo'; } my $object = 'Bar'; # just the class name my $method = 'Bar::foo'; print "$object->$method ", eval { $object->$method } ? 'ok' : 'not o +k'; print "&$method($object) ", eval { &$method($object) } ? 'ok' : 'not o +k'; __END__ Bar->Bar::foo ok &Bar::foo(Bar) not ok
sincefor (@$chain) { ... }
ihb
See perltoc if you don't know which perldoc to read!
In reply to Re: Method chain object with easy syntax
by ihb
in thread Method chain object with easy syntax
by ambrus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |