And frankly, I wouldn't want it to store objects. The design is clean... adding blessings alongside would clutter up the protocols needed to access the existing metadata. If you send it an "export" call, should it be DBM::Deep's export, or the native object export? That's the kind of confusion you'd get by permitting objects in the mix.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
In reply to Re^4: Implement Object Persistence (II)
by merlyn
in thread Implement Object Persistence (II)
by tucano
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |