And we've done group /msg boxes and they suck quite a bit.
injunjoel, we already have a system for persistent public conversations and it is nodes and replies. I see extremely little advantage to some system like "/msg" but persistent and shared compared to just posting nodes. And I see lots of advantages to the existing node system over shared /msgs.
- tye
In reply to Re^3: Channelling the CB (group /msg)
by tye
in thread Channelling the CB
by g0n
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |