I still disagree. In real world cases tightly integrated designs have often been viable a decade or more before modularized designs came to market.
You seem to be implying (and please correct me if I'm wrong ;-) that loosely coupled systems are necessarily slower to market and/or perform significantly worse than tightly coupled solutions?
If so, I'm not entirely convinced. When I see tightly coupled software being produced it's normally a combination of one or more of:
Sure - there are some instances where a tightly coupled system has been deliberately chosen due to some constraint - but they seem rare in my experience. More often they're done first because that's the only way the developers know how to create software.
In reply to Re^6: Loose coupling (was Random quotes ...)
by adrianh
in thread Random quotes in the top left corner
by cog
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |