It made me wonder what else is considered (more or less officially) broken in Perl 5
I'd put Perl 5's prototypes into the broken category.
The name is broken because almost everybody thinks of things like C's prototypes where Perl's prototypes are a completely different beast.
Secondly they're not general enough - witness the fact that there are several built in functions that cannot have their calling-style represented with a prototype.
Perl 6 will, of course, fix this with its much more flexible calling syntax and grammar system.
In reply to Re: What's broken in Perl 5?
by adrianh
in thread What's broken in Perl 5?
by tlm
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |