No, I said \w+ not (http|https|...). And that was intentional. I hate "reserved word" schemes.
A few exceptions isn't a big deal. People can't link to those few nodes by title (unless the titles are updated, since those titles mostly aren't great anyway). Having a whole raft of nodes matching /^\w+:/ is a problem (for your proposal).
- tye
In reply to Re^8: Perl 6 links (//)
by tye
in thread Perl 6 links
by Juerd
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |