Yeah, but isn't the real problem here the need to build non-pure-Perl code in the first place? If we could just write everything in pure Perl, wouldn't this whole issue pretty much just go away? Aren't the makefiles (if you even need them at all) for pure Perl modules so blindingly simple that MakeMaker wouldn't *need* any new features to handle them?

To my way of thinking, all the effort going into things like MakeMaker only serves one purpose: to prolong the viability of writing Perl modules in C long enough for Perl6 to make doing so totally unnecessary (at least, I certainly *hope* Perl6 has that effect).

In reply to Re: Why Module::Build? by jonadab
in thread Why Module::Build? by Ovid

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.