Oops...gotta hate when the top of your message directly conflicts with the bottom of the message.
I should have said 'may be faster' not 'is faster'. The OO style is less memory intensive. In some situations, especially under mod_perl, the difference can be noticable.
There is also, as mentioned in the CGI CGI docs, a little bit of overhead when importing the functions into your namespace that will most likely be more apparent when running shorter scripts.
So basically, although the individual method/function calls may be a little bit slower under OO, the overhead it initialization may strip you of that speed.
Of course, this goes back to the problem of benchmarks -- someone else's tests may not be representative of your situation, so if you're worried about it, you'd want to run your own tests.
In reply to Re^3: why use OO nature in CGI?
by jhourcle
in thread why use OO nature in CGI?
by sulfericacid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |