Since I'm in the process of fiddling an Everything pre1.0 site into life, I maybe have a perspective on that.. I feel quite a bit of PM would not be too hard to port: create special tables, ie those for approval, re-create nodetypes, port the many superdocs, nodelets, containers and so on, create the whole XML business (displaytypes etc).. And then theres the renamed functions (eg isApproved is now inGroup)..
Ok, so maybe not *hard* as such, but probably would involve a lot of poking around to find out which functions have been renamed, or moved, so it would not be a quick job, anyhow.. And then if one wanted to make use of new features, like nodemethods (though I've personally found them slightly more annoying, so far), which replace the maintainance nodes, among other things, it would be even longer..
Well, maybe when someone has a month or 4 to spare..
C.
In reply to Re^2: Wat was the Architecture used in perlmonks
by castaway
in thread Wat was the Architecture used in perlmonks
by kprasanna_79
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |