Great! This is exactly the code idea I wanted. Are there any other ways without using such a construct (just for the sake of TIMTOWDI)?
I was always unsure of the level of support of enclosing code within regexen. Do you know what kinds of things can go wrong?
In reply to Re^2: Regexes: finding ALL matches (including overlap)
by kaif
in thread Regexes: finding ALL matches (including overlap)
by kaif
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |