However, the +(..) "trick" is very well-known ...
No arguments there, and if you're used to it, by all means run with it. That just means it's part of your personal style.
Me, I prefer not to think about syntax precendence if I can avoid it. That isn't a 'better' way of looking at things, it just means we have different regional dialects. ;-)
In reply to Re^4: The perils of being tricky
by mstone
in thread The perils of being tricky
by mstone
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |