I agree. If expect to use the code for more than once, I always take the time for readability. And I usually try to leave a comment line saying what I was thinking at the time, not how I wrote it that day - 'comment at the level of intent' as McConnell would say.
For every Perl idiom, there is usually more than one way of writing it - TMTOWTDI, after all - and they will surely occupy different points on the readability spectrum. Not to mention the 'pedanticness' spectrum.
In reply to Re^2: The perils of being tricky
by other90percent
in thread The perils of being tricky
by mstone
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |