You're taking quite minor complaints about the source code far too seriously. I wouldn't even have bothered to mention these issues if the source hadn't been advanced as something to emulate. I certainly didn't mean it to sound like "bashing." Sorry if you were offended by my off-hand remarks.
In reply to Re^4: What CPAN modules are "good reads"?
by perrin
in thread What CPAN modules are "good reads"?
by tlm
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |