well, calling the routine in question gives me the correct list, so i just need to check and make sure that it's populated.
I'm probably misunderstanding, but....
If you know it is the correct list, why do you need to check if it's populated?
Wouldn't it be better to check for the correct list being returned anyway? Even if you are 100% certain that the current code works, you might break something later on and a more concrete test will catch that.
Isn't a more concrete is_deeply() test is simpler to write?
In reply to Re^9: Test::More and is_array
by adrianh
in thread Test::More and is_array
by geektron
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |