Why do you want to do that? These four statements are very readable, combining them into one complex one would result in less readily understandable code.

In addition to that, I think an equivalent single regex would be tricky to think of. Just consider the delicate details:

Trying to preserve all that in a single statement makes my head hurt.

Some of these complexities are maybe in error. I do not know what you are trying to do, of course, but perhaps you want to strip all quotation marks, not only the first one. Once you need to debug code, four simple regex are easier to grasp than one complex regex.

So, I would suggest to stick with what you have now.


In reply to Re: shortening substitutions by Thilosophy
in thread shortening substitutions by Lhamo_rin

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.