If I understand you correctly, you're using threads instead of scatter/gather processing?

I don't really see where exactly the gain would be, is the programming simpler, or maybe the setup?

However, I find this statement to be really strange: Any large structure(s) of data where different subsections can be worked on independantly, but the results must be fed back to the main process would benefit from threads. This is perfect application for workers pool model, why do you believe threads fit here?

If there would be really large structure, something like gigabytes-worth-of-data, that need to be edited in place, and can be edited by multiple workers, that would be perfect application for threads.

In reply to Re^4: Threading vs perl by Eyck
in thread Threading vs perl by Eyck

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.