I think having "correct" as part of the name is pretty meaningless — nobody purposefully creates a Cpan module that's incorrect.
How about just Net::IP::Range? Or Net::IP::Range::Split? Definitely "range" needs to be in there somewhere since that's what the module deals with; merely calling it Net::IP::Correct makes it sound like it's an alternative to Net::IP but that is "correct" (and thereby implies that Net::IP is in some way incorrect).
Smylers
In reply to Re: RFC: CPAN module Net::IP::Correct
by Smylers
in thread RFC: CPAN module Net::IP::Correct
by arc_of_descent
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |