I think Simple is a poor name for any module since it doesn't say anything about what it does. I'm guilty of the same thing, but I note that in Regrettable module names. I recommend you find the special, stand-out functional feature that makes your module different from all the other logging modules and get that into the name somehow.
You can also discuss module names on the module-authors and modules lists (both @perl.org).
In reply to Re: Module Renaming Suggestions
by brian_d_foy
in thread Module Renaming Suggestions
by TGI
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |