For something to be seminal it only has to be first, and with a thorough literature review one can claim seminality for one's own work.
On a related note, not pertaining to the article in question; it is interesting to note how often "seminal" is confused with "good". There is great value in firsts, but they are frequently not good paragons of their form.
In reply to Re^3: Perl not BNF-able??
by willyyam
in thread Perl not BNF-able??
by anonymized user 468275
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |