A few more print()'s would make this clear...
Update: Fixed a typo, plus here's a modified version that makes it clearer what's happening (to me, anyhow):
#!perl -l use strict; use warnings; my $some_word = 'race'; my @letters = split //, $some_word; my (@array1, @array2); for (1 .. @letters) { my @new = @letters; push (@array1, \@new); push (@array2, \@letters); my $myshift = shift @letters; push(@letters, $myshift); print "$_ : @letters : $array1[-1] : $array2[-1]" } print ''; print "array1 contains:"; foreach my $aref (@array1) { print "$aref => @$aref"; } print ''; print "array2 contains:"; foreach my $aref (@array2) { print "$aref => @$aref"; } __END__ 1 : a c e r : ARRAY(0x8067740) : ARRAY(0x805f380) 2 : c e r a : ARRAY(0x807c91c) : ARRAY(0x805f380) 3 : e r a c : ARRAY(0x807c8c8) : ARRAY(0x805f380) 4 : r a c e : ARRAY(0x807c820) : ARRAY(0x805f380) array1 contains: ARRAY(0x8067740) => r a c e ARRAY(0x807c91c) => a c e r ARRAY(0x807c8c8) => c e r a ARRAY(0x807c820) => e r a c array2 contains: ARRAY(0x805f380) => r a c e ARRAY(0x805f380) => r a c e ARRAY(0x805f380) => r a c e ARRAY(0x805f380) => r a c e
Update 2: kiat asks: (W)hy doesn't \@letters point to the changed @letters inside the loop? That's just it--it does!
In reply to Re^3: Puzzled by array
by trammell
in thread Puzzled by array
by kiat
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |