FAQs can be valuable by collecting Frequently Asked Questions. A useful adjunct would be a FGATAW - Frequently Given Answers That Are Wrong.
I've seen this approach used to constructive effect in other endeavors; I wonder how many zingers y'all have seen...
In reply to FGATAW - the companion to a FAQ by herveus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |